Lewis Smith, Environment Reporter
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
Waste-disposal units designed to turn leftover food into electricity and fertiliser could be built around every town and city as part of a scheme being considered by ministers.
The new generation of anaerobic digesters has been developed in a government-sponsored trial designed to find ways of solving the shortage of landfill sites.
They will be ideally located in suburbs because, unlike previous models, the new units are not reliant on farm slurry to provide moisture for the recycling process. Without the smelly transportation of animal waste, the prospect of plants in urban areas, will, the Government hopes, be a lot easier for residents to digest.
The ability to process waste on a commercial scale without using slurry was developed as part of a £30million trial in Ludlow, Shropshire, by Greenfinch, an engineering firm working with government backing, in partnership with South Shropshire District Council. It was prompted by the need to reduce the 16-18 million tonnes of waste food that is buried as landfill each year.
Anaerobic digesters produce fertiliser and biogas, a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide, which is burnt to generate renewable electricity.
The merits of putting them near small villages have become the hot debate in the Radio 4 soap The Archers, where the community of Ambridge is at loggerheads over the proposed installation of a farm-scale unit.
Most waste food in Britain, including 6.7million tonnes from households, is disposed of in landfill sites where it decomposes and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. The average person throws away four times their own body weight in food each year.
Pressure on space means that the country is running out of suitable sites for landfill and, with punitive landfill taxes introduced to encourage alternatives, digesters are increasingly being seen as an environmentally friendly solution.
Joan Ruddock, the Environment Minister, described Ludlow as “the way forward” after being given a tour of the unit this week.
She said: “Anaerobic digestion is extremely attractive. Why would we go on throwing food waste into holes in the ground when we could generate our own electricity and end up with a product that can be returned to the soil? It seems to me that a plant on this scale would fit into any industrial estate anywhere in the country. While the decision has to be taken locally - and in consultation with residents - I am sure this is the way forward.”
She added that she has taken to listening to the anaerobic digester saga on The Archers: “I try to listen to it when I can to see how they are getting on, but all I seem to have heard about lately is the Grundys' love life.”
David Woolgar, of Greenfinch, said: “The advantage of the new system demonstrated in Ludlow is the likelihood such plants can move into built-up areas.” He is confident that the plants offer a money-making option for councils and businesses.
Philip Dunne, Conservative MP for Ludlow, is an enthusiastic supporter of the digester and believes the technology will simultaneously help to solve the landfill problem and make a profit.
“It holds out the prospect of a commercially viable waste energy system which on its own should reduce local authority waste collection and disposal costs,” he said. At its maximum production level, the Ludlow digester should be able to generate 1,400 megawatt hours of electricity each year, and engineers expect to be able soon to harness the heat generated by the plant.
Anaerobic digester technology has been available for decades and more than 4,000 have been built in Germany. But besides Ludlow, only four other commercial-scale digesters, which in essence mimic the workings of a cow's stomach, have been built in Britain - two in England and two in Scotland - and there are fewer than a dozen farm-scale units.
The Government is so confident that anaerobic digesters offer a realistic means of dealing with food waste that earlier this year it offered £10million in grants to encourage the construction of further demonstrator plants. Plans for at least 60 are under way in Britain.
A variety of technologies for treating food waste are being investigated, but confidence in anaerobic digestion is high and Liz Goodwin of the Waste Resources Action Programme (Wrap), a government-funded body, said the number of plants built in Britain was about to rise exponentially.
Businesses are also showing increasing interest in sending their food waste to digesters rather than landfill and the supermarket Waitrose has just signed up to a trial involving five branches that will send food beyond its sell-by date to a biogas plant run by Biogen in Bedfordshire.
The commercial food recycling scheme is operated by Cawleys, which collects leftovers from organisations including the Treasury, city lawyers and Raymond Blanc's Brasserie in Milton Keynes.
Find your perfect energy efficient house
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Tanker21
Half a wheelie bin of food waste? Theres some very rich families out there if they can afford to waste that much money. Personally a few bones would be it. I eat or compost the rest. Better for business though as shops and restaurents have a much harder time keeping waste down.
Sarah, Crawley, West Sussex
When I read about technologies that solve problems with our current waste, I feel sad, because I need to see the production of waste reduced, not managed. I would prefer to see a movement towards showing the public and manufacturers the positive benefits of reducing our waste from the outset.
Alex Ross, Bristol, UK
What if the acidic and the basic were separated. Wouldn't it be like plugging a lightbulb into a potato and a lemon?
shams, fayetteville, ar
All very well, but it presumably involves even tighter control over domestic waste separation and quality of sorting. I hope someone is doing a study on that - and the economics of collection and transport, assuming that each household/ produces (say) < half a wheelie bin of food waste per week.
tanker21, London,
its a very good idea and accords well with the principle waste not want not time was when everyone had a pig bucket into which unwanted food went for the pig but that is no longer allowed and very few people have their own pig
peter c, devizes, wessex
Most waste sites are already capped so the methane can be extracted and used as fuel - so no contribution to so-called greenhouse gases. Also, there is no shortage of landfill sites This is a myth. Look to the EU if you want the real reason.
David G, carshalton,
Why is it necessary to spend £30millions to achieve what is already being done in Germany?
Tom Forsyth, Hereford,
Great Britain used to be the leading innovator in the world until it became a 'de facto' colony of the USA and every innovation has now to be sold or given to the USA by default. This type of composting has been known for decades, as the article suggests, so nothing new guys.
Rex, Kathmandu, Nepal
The reason why these schemes have not taken off in the UK is the dead hand of the Environment Agency which treats them as "scheduled processes" and charges huge fees for "authorisation", thus making them uneconomic in private use.
Richard North, Bradford,
Some clarification.
1. Think Ludlow trial cost was £3 million, not £30 million.
2. Fewer than a dozen farm scale units, but originally nearly 50. Economics of on-farm slurry digestion not as good as for food waste, hence the reduction.
3. AD plants are good neighbours - MP's are right to support.
Ade Jones, Lydney, Glos
This is an important technolgy, old and well tested, with many of the virtues discussed above. The currant failure is the lack joined up Govt direction and funding. The German funding system should be adopted and access to the National Grid should be easier and cheaper. planning only granted for CHP
Rob, Plymouth, Devon
It's about time. Britain is so slow to catch on to schemes that are just a way of life in countries like Germany. It is so easy to recycle there, you hardly have to think about it. Far better than charging people for having too much rubbish (which is impossible to regulate fairly anyway). Come on!
Gigi, London,
A brick works near where I used to live was powered by the gas produced from its local landfill site. It strikes me that this is an even better idea, but yes Swampy and friends will no doubt find something wrong with the idea.
Roz, Barnsley, UK
MP's are always quick to support such schemes, but you never hear of them being built next to their homes. MP's are the ultimate nimby's.
Arthur, Newcastle,
This will give swampy and his band of geeks something else to protest about
Chris, Maidstone,