You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
The disgraced rock singer Gary Glitter could find himself locked up in a notoriously overcrowded Thai detention centre if he refuses to board a flight to Britain from Bangkok airport, Thai officials said today.
The Thai immigration service declared Glitter, 64, "persona non grata" when he arrived in Bangkok last night after his deportation from Vietnam, where he served nearly three years for sexually assaulting two young girls.
But after disembarking in Bangkok he refused to continue the journey to London. Instead, complaining of dizziness and distress, Glitter rented a transit lounge room for the night.
Lieutenant General Chatchawal Suksomjit, the Thai immigration chief, said: "We will have to repatriate him back to Vietnam, because he is on our watch list as persona non grata. Thai immigration cannot let him enter.
"Officials concerned are working through the process of putting him on the plane to take him out of the country, but if he continues to refuse to leave then he will confined in the (airport transit) area temporarily before being taken into a detention centre."
The detention centre in question, at Suan Phlu, usually houses around 1,200 illegal immigrants from other South-East Asian countries such as Burma, Cambodia and Laos and from further afield.
Most remain at the centre for only a few hours but other detainees can remain there for a year or more, with little food and in rooms with 40 other inmates. British diplomats have in the past raised concerns about the conditions they are forced to endure and Thai officials clearly doubt that Glitter would want to spend much time there.
Major General Pongdej Chaiprawaj, head of the immigration police at Bangkok airport, said Glitter had faked an ear condition that would have prevented him from flying. "He claimed to have tinnitus in his ears and declined to board the flight to London," he said, adding that Glitter was being shadowed by Thai police to prevent him from entering the country.
"He is banned from entering because he was jailed and he could pose a threat to domestic morality," he said. "He is a transit passenger and it is the responsibility of the airline to take him to his final destination."
The terms of Glitter's sentence called for his deportation on his release and if he is returned to Vietnam, it is almost certain that he will be put back on a flight to London. However Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, is determined to stay out of the UK.
"I'm not going back to London," he said when he arrived in Thailand. "You can't make me. I've done my time. I'm a free man."
After he refused to re-board the flight to London last night British Embassy officials were called in. Thai immigration officials declined to force Glitter back on the plane and the British police officer escorting him admitted that he had no jurisdiction to make him board the aircraft.
As the officials pondered the situation, flight TG901 pulled away from the gate with Glitter still at the airport.
He was travelling on a passport issued by the British consulate in Ho Chi Minh City last November. He has the same rights as any British citizen to travel to any country that does not require a visa.
However he has been denied the right to enter Singapore and Hong Kong and his future remains uncertain.
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
£28k+ Basic + Commission
Drummond Selection
London
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think it's punishmentt enough having to return to the UK !.
Beckerman, London,
He should give the royalties from one of his hits to a childrens charity, and seek help, the pedophiles we should worry about are the ones who are not famous and who the goverment protect by putting them in are communities with out telling the local population who they are.
David, NEWCASTLE, ENGLAND
.Child abuse pictures on computer (this creates more abuse ), convicted off actual abuse He had no consideration for the horrendous abuse and The terror the children must have been going throw .So why should he be aloud to get on with his life he lost all rights to be treated like a human being.
Colin, Edinburgh, midlothian
I bet if J. Smith hadn't piped up with her bit of bandwagon-jumping, Gadd/Glitter would have been on his scheduled flight back!
Paul, London, UK
Leave this man alone. He has served his time and like most of us has no real desire to live to the UK. It is more shameful that the home secretary has nothing better to do than comment on a specific case and specific individual, rather than worrying about the fact that the country is falling apart.
James McLean, Bradford, England
Its about time the Uk Government cancelled his passport and forced him to return to the uk he is a convicted pedophile and is a danger to children worldwide.Ms smith wants sacking for giving him the warning of what was going to happen to him when he returned.
charles, Chaing mai, Thailand
However much one may dislike the man, there is no justice in failing to allow a man his liberty after serving his sentence for crimes committed. Draconian punishments prevent any rehabilitation.
John MacLeod, Inverness, Scotland
I don't think Singapore will let him in. I agree that he appears completely unrepentant and is a continuing danger to young children. He should go back to the only country with an obligation to take him in - the UK.
Peter, Singapore,
Unfortunately Doris castration does not make children safe from peodophiles.
Also, this article states that Glitter would be visited by police and probation. Glitter would have no supervision by the probation service as he is not on a statutory order.
Julia, Kent, UK
Surely most, if not all, of the visa waiver countries, would neverthless require a person with a serious conviction to apply for a visa before travel. Is he just going to go on airport hopping like this for the rest of his life? Can he be sent to Guantamo Bay?
Liz, Inverness,
Force him to reside in an old people's home, I say. That'll stop him getting up to his old tricks.
Lt Colonel Ronald Sanderson-Smyth, Tunbridge Wells,
He's a criminal, and should be treated accordingly by the UK authorities when he returns. But the media circus surrounding him is extremely distasteful and should be stopped. It shows the media doing what it does best - lascivious scandal mongering.
Timothy, Manchester, England
Every country in the world, apart from this one, doesn't seem to have a problem deporting undesirables, so maybe the Home Secretary could look at this with the same enthusiasm she's showing in Gadd's case. However, Gadd will be hounded, not for what he is, but for who he is
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
Any man who abuses the most vulnerable in society (children) has no right to claim to be a part of that society. He should therefore lose his rights to freedom of movement, as he is no longer a trusted member of society. In truth he should still be in prison.
Gubby, Sevenoaks, UK
Not one comment put on here is strong enough so far! All paedophiles should be locked up for life, that was they cannot do harm to anymore childred, anywhere. Many people cannot go on to have a normal loving, trusting relationship with a partner. LOCK THEM UP FOREVER AND THROW AWAY THE KEY.
Sandy, Southampton,
What I don't understand is if he is claiming that he is innocent of charges, then why is he so reluctant to return to Britain and face the music. Could there be some guilt somewhere in that mind of his?
Stephen Evans, Kalkara, Malta, G.C.
What I want to know is who is paying his airfairs !!!
Bring him back to the UK lock him up and throw away the key !!!
Nicky, Alton, UK
its ridiculus. He had an encounter with two young girls who he thought were over 18 and now he's public enemy No 1? there have been a lot worse sex offenders that got half the publicity and I think the british media should be ashamed of the way he has been persicuted and followed around the world.
ross, bristol, england
I wouldn't mind his airmiles!
Barry, Telford, UK
Why was he granted a new passport in November while in prison, surely if he was not granted one, he would have been deported back to the UK immediatley.
Paul Smith, Leeds, UK
There should be a simple monastic cell for such as Gadd: enough food to live on, books and TV, a visitor once a month, regular exercise. Then release him only if it is crystal clear he is not a danger to children.
Kevin Straw, Leicester,
Whilst I applaud Vietnam, Thailand and Hong Kong for throwing this man out of their countries I wonder if it is only the UK that fails to expel foreign criminals, terrorist suspects and plane hijackers because of their alleged human rights. Glitter seems to have forfeited his rights in SE Asia.
William Epps, Broadstairs, England
Shame the Met does not have the same interest in the events in Jersey.Child abuse is bad but noone ever suggested Glitter was a murderer.
The killers in Jersey are still alive and kicking and most likely still active in murderous paedophile rings like Detroux in Belgium.Jersey beggars belief
David Smith, Geneva, CH
I knew Gadd briefly when I worked for the film company that produced his film Remember Me This Way. I thought he was charismatic, mind you I was barely 20 at the time. A male colleague laughed when he heard I liked him, saying, "You're WAY too old for Paul". Years later I knew what he meant.
Yvonne, Doncaster, UK
Yes, Donquixote of Bristol, I agree with your comments about the media and the airline.
I do also condemn Gadd and all his actions absolutely.
Chris, Ashford, Middx, England
Are the parents/officials/businessmen who play at least some part in providing under aged girls to 'tourists' ever charged with living off immoral earnings etc ? No; Thought not. We are retreating into a world were only white men are 'responsible adults'. Take care : That path ends in plantations.
Eric Skelton, Cardiff, Wales
I have absolutely no sympathy for Gadd, but what everyone should recognise is that he is exactly what this bankrupt govement thrive on, an easy target.
steve lloyd, swansea, uk
Hopefully this will draw attention to the significant numbers of men who look like Gary Glitter and who live in Cambodia these days after a change in Thai law last year displaced them. Glitter is disgusting but remember that he isnt the worst by far.
Julian Peterson, Singapore, UK / Singapore
A simple solution would be for the British government to rescind his passport. He cannot go from country to country without one. He was a known pedophile and he was allowed to travel even though there was plenty of speculation that he would head to Asia. Not a good ambassador for Britain.
Kevin Maloney, London, Ontario, Canada
Am I alone in being disgusted by the "Media" being permitted to photograph him whilst in-flight? This shows total contempt for the other passengers' privacy . Anyone know which Airline was involved in this circus? I'd like to ensure that I never use this carrier.
Donquixote, Bristol, U.K.
Why should Mr Gadd be allowed to roam from one country to the next free to pray on young children? He may well have "done his time" but that hardly proves that he is a reformed character. Well done to those countries that have taken a stance by refusing to accept him.
Yasmin, Brighton, UK
Yes he is now a free man, but he is forced to return to the United Kingdom, or at the very least, europe.
He has no right of residence in Thailand, or any other asian country.He has no immigration rights to enter or remain in their borders.If he wants to stay he'll have to obtain a valid visa.
elizabeth, leeds, england
I think Glitter was stiched up in Vietnam - the parents of those two girls accepted money from him, hardly appropriate, was it? The last thing I'd do would be to accept cash from someone accused of abusing my children.
I think the Vietnamese made an example of him and the British press will too.
Jon, LA,
The labour party would turn all of the UK into a prison if it got the chance.
richard mullens, London, Europe
Yes, agreed, he's served his time. But should us British do-gooders simply leave him to his own devices? I don't think so. Perhaps, John, it would be fair to say that you wouldn't be overly keen on the prospect of him disembarking in Los Angeles and settling down to a life of anonymity in the USA?
Richard Ellis, Consett, County Durham
No surprise to see Jacqui Smith rush into Talksport's tabloid studios to pronounce her intention to pile on yet more 'Think of the Children!' legislation. Pathetic. As for Mr Gadd: he has served his time and is a free man. Or we do we just go ahead and suspend all pretence of justice..?
Tom, Bradford, UK
I thought he was in a rush to get back here so he could take advantage of the NHS? While I think he deserves anything he gets, it seems unfair that resident UK paedos are allowed to live their lives as they wish (until they're caught at it the next time anyway) once their sentence has been served.
RM, Poole, England
Let him back into the country, castrate him and then every child will be safe and he can choose to live anywhere!
Doris, Swansea,
Oh Clare, how witty you are - you clearly enjoy our press though.
Glitter should be forced to return to his homeland, as should foreign nationals released from British prisons, without any questions or arguments about human rights.
Laura M, london,
Why don't people just stand up and say what they really want to happen, and that is for Gadd to commit suicide.
A person should be punished for commiting a crime, but to be hounded by the media and Smith afterwards is unacceptable.
And we pay for a British police officer to escort him from Vietnam
P.Robinson, Northants,
I am truly appauled at the state of britain today when people in my own country as saying that "he has done his time, leave him alone".Would they say the same if he had abused their children? I think not. What about the life sentence the child has trying to come to terms with abuse in later life?
Alex, Glasgow, Scotland
Andrew, London - We almost certainly do receive paedophile visitors and immigrants. CRB checks only reveal british convictions. Foreign workers with foreign convictions are not revealed by the checks as there is no international sex offenders register. They are free to work with our children!
James, Worcester, UK
He may think he has served his time but in my opinion he has walked away scot free from his greatest crimes .......his so called `music` ! Rock and Roll Pt II .. bring back the birch I say !!
Steve, Portsmouth,
Everybody who shows understanding for this contemptible man should imagine him being their "nice" next-door neighbour!!!!
Elga, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
to mike from surry. if it were your kids you would not say that
s ross, pinoso, spain
"He's done his time. It's time to leave him alone.
Alastair, Alicante, Spain"
Who do you think you are, the only leaviing alone he will get is when he is left to rott in prison! The guy is sick beyond belief!
Robert, aberdeen,
Why should any country allow a convicted child molester into its borders. One could even argue British goverment is also to blame for allowing him to travel. In my book, crimes against children of this nature has a life time penalty, he might be out of jail, but he will never be free.
Andrew, London, England
Would you be happy if your country allow convicted child molesters into the borders? The UK had a duty to prevent him from travelling. In my book this sort of crimes deserves a life time. He might be out of jail, but he will never be free. Those with children will understand their total trust in us.
Jim, London, England
Whilst I totally condemn Glitter for his filthy paedophile peversions, I do have some sympathy with his not wanting to get on a flight to London. If someone was forcing me to go there it would cause me dizziness and distress too.
Clare, Perth, Australia
'Not a very nice man'. I think that's an understatement Mike. He is a paedophile, would you want that man living near you? The time he has served is nothing compared to what the children he abused have suffered.
Claire , London, UK
What is more ridiculous is that this man was allowed to leave Britain after he was already convicted in the UK. How would we react if other countries allow their child molesters to go on holiday to Britain and even come and live here. Does our government not have a duty to tell every other country.
Andrew, London,
Yes he has been punished and served his time, but not for long enough as far as i'm concerned!! Why should this creature be free to no doubt offend again. What about those poor kids he's abused, what about their life sentances their serving because of his selfish actions. He makes me sick!!
sheila, folkestone, england
I could not believe the number of photographers on his plane surrounding him .If the TV stopped reporting him then we wouldn't have to listen to his records being played, everytime his names brought up. Without airtime no royalties !.
kirk, Rotherham, UK
Not a very nice man, but he has been punished and served his sentence.
Is it right that he should get a life sentence from the UK, and the public, and be hounded for the rest of his days?
Not even some violent murderers get treated like that.
Mike, Surrey, UK
As a British citizen resident in Thailand and working legally as a teacher in a school with students ranging in age from three to sixteen, I am disgusted with this appalling criminal. Why does this criminal assume that he has the "right" to enter Thailand? So that he can have sex with children here?
Robert, Samut Prakan, Thailand
Like it or not, people are not going to forget what this man has done. He's a monster...
Willow, London,
I dont blame countries for refusing him entry, hes a convicted peodophile caught abusing 10 year old girls. 3 years and he's done his time? Rubish! They should have thrown away the key.
Sean, London,
Ironic that a developing country such as Vietnam is more efficient than a developed one - the UK - in expelling its foreign prisoners.
Julian - the comment "!'threat to domestic morality'" made me smile too!!
Richard Garland, Greater Manchester,
I have no sympathy for the devil, but on the other hand I believe he has served his time and should just be left alone.
Alex, London,
British dogooders hey Mr Readyhoff, he was convicted of child abuse, Is this ok in your world?
Alex, London, Englan
hello hello good to be back thats what glitter will be say whene he returns back 2 the uk its best just 2 leave him a long hes done hes time
kevin wilson, anerley, london
While I have no sympathy for the man, I have nothing but contempt for politicians like Smith who try to win Brownie points through pointless sound-bites. He should be treated like all other individuals who have committed these offences. Do they have all these nonsense limitations to their freedoms?
James Cullup, Oxford,
He's done his time. It's time to leave him alone.
Alastair, Alicante, Spain
This man has always operated on a basis that all publicity is good publicity. I am at a loss to understand why the media thinks any of us is remotely interested in his unpleasant and sordid life.
M.J. Frizell, Payzac, France
So he's caught between a rock and a hard place. He ought to be happy about that, for initially he could have faced a firing party.
Life is tough and then . . . .
Dennis, Portland OR , US
he,s served his time .. the British do gooders should leave him alone .. all this talk about being on a list of offenders, not allowing him to leave Britain and no access to internet is a load of rubish. All he has to do is use a buddies account to use the internet .. there are ways around anything.
john readyhoff, Los Angeles, USA, California
Well, he is not stupid. The fact is that loads of people in the UK will want to have a crack at him, rightly or wrongly, and he would not be safe in the UK.
Not that anyone should care about this.
Chris, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic