Joanna Sugden
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
Tough new measures to get unemployed single parents into work could leave them worse off and should be delayed because of the economic crisis, a senior government advisor said today.
Sir Richard Tilt, chair of the Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC) and one of the architects of the plan to force lone parents, disabled people and the long-term unemployed to seek work or have their benefits withdrawn, said ministers should reconsider in light of the current state of the job market.
Sir Richard said the welfare-to-work drive, to be introduced next week, could push lone parent families into poverty and should be set back by one or two years until the fog of recession lifts.
Currently, single parents with a youngest child under 16 can claim income support without having to show they are seeking work.
But from next week, lone parents with a youngest child of 12 or over who apply for income support will be put on Jobseekers’ Allowance and expected to look for work or face sanctions, including having their benefits cut by up to 40 per cent.
Only those with disabled or sick children will be exempt.
By 2010, the rule will be extended to lone parents with a youngest child aged seven or over.
Sir Richard said: “Benefit rates are relatively low and if you are going to reduce someone’s benefit for a few weeks by 40 per cent you are pushing people much closer to poverty.
“Of course, the child will suffer, but it’s not the child that has fallen foul of the system.”
His remarks will come as a blow to ministers who have already faced a backlash over the reforms from left-wing MPs and charities who claim they will penalise the most vulnerable among Britain’s 4.5 million benefits claimants.
However, Tony McNulty, employment minister, told the BBC that the economic downturn meant it was more important than ever to equip people for work.
“In the 1980s and 1990s people were moved onto incapacity benefits and left to languish with no help or support to return to work,” he said.
“These changes will ensure that lone parents are ready for work whenever jobs become available.”
James Purnell, Work and Pension Secretary, rejected calls for a delay.
“I think it would be wrong, at a time when it may be harder for people to find work, to provide them with less help,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“We know that our help works; we know that the help they get from the voluntary sector, from providers and from JobCentre Plus works, it changes people’s lives.”
Chris Graying, Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary said the changes were essential.
“It would be disastrous for Britain to do a U-turn on welfare reform,” he said.
“It would have the effect of making poverty worse and condemning millions of people in some of our most deprived communities to endless benefit dependency.
“Right now, when the jobs market is tough, we need real action to help people who’ve been on benefits for a long time to make the journey back into work and not simply assume that because unemployment is rising that there’s no hope for them.”
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
£28k+ Basic + Commission
Drummond Selection
London
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Obviously the people who think living on benefit is 'cushy' have never tried it. My family and I were on benefits for a while when my husband was made redundant. It's horrible, degrading and I can't really believe people choose to do it. When people fall on hard times they shouldn't be stigmatized.
Emma , Redditch, Worcestershire
Im a single parent of 4 kids having the last couple of years resettle after domestic violence.My kids are diff ages but on top of this i have various medical problems and am in constant pain and use crutches alot..I struggle to look after my home and children and Im studying for a degree at home.
Pippa Dannatt, amesbury, uk
Based on a previous comment regarding crime and unsupervised children I propose that we make it illegal for single parents to obtain work. We should force them to stay at home and smack the criminality out of their kids.
Obviously I am being completely facetious but wanted to make a point.
Sean, London,
cut benefits and make all those incompetant bankers live at reduced benefit level for a couple of years . Then ask someone who left school at 15 worked in industry for years, put on the scrap heap struggled on temp jobs then regarded as too old - Pearlman never worked til he was 22 spoilt brat
Alec, Wrexham, UK
Perhaps NUlabour will be looking for work after the next election
But, who would employ them ????
graham, Swansea, UK
I was a single parent when my daughter was born and went back to work when she was 8 eight weeks old; tough choice to make I wasn't particularly even skilled, working for a temping agency doing secretarial / reception work. No excuse to lard it around expecting handouts.
sarah, Coventry, West Midlands
To do this at any time is unfair but in the middle of a recession. Five very able bodied people I know cant get work, two are in Temporary jobs, and one is in a low paid job well below their abilities. Its just right wing delusional politics. In the USA 15 million homes are dependant on food aid!!!
James, Brighton, England
I Used to work for the home office for a crime prevention unit and it was clear that unsupervised young people were those most liable to being criminally active or the victims of crime.
by forcing single parents into work (assuming there are jobs to be had) will increase crime rates enormously.
Mike FW, Porth, UK
I already live in poverty. Does this mean if nobody will employ me my benefit will be cut? I'm already skipping meals so that my kids don't go without. Nobody chooses this "cushy life" but it appears that people will still judge and blame the most vulnerable. These changes are delusional.
Sandy, Bristol, UK
If secondary school hours at least matched the possible working day of parents it would go a long way to making the return to employment easier
As if stands children leave school mid-afternoon - encouraging teenagers to roam the streets with their mates until parents return home from work
Eleanor, Hants, uk
It is not ideal for young children to be taken to school very early, be collected from an aftercare club at 6 pm or later, be taken home by an exhausted mother who has to then cook dinner, bath the children, supervise homework, etc. A dreadful life for them all, and much social damage will result.
Margaret, Ealing, UK
Why do people want to harm such families? It is to society's advantage for mums to care for their own children. Getting them into work (paid or voluntary), and preventing them looking after their own children, helps no-one, especially not the innocent children. Such mothers are not all spongers!
Margaret, Ealing, UK
Plenty of annoying jobs around my house and garden that such people could do. How about giving me a tax break on their wages so I can pay them to do some cleaning and gardening? Seems like a pretty good way to get their benefits bill down BUT of course where would the public sector get their cut?
Rose, Stirling, UK
Key word is could. We've thrown gobs of money at these people and seen no improvement in their motivation to find work. The only thing left is to remove the cushy lives they have, maybe that will be all the motivation they need.
Andy D, Manchester,
But don't forget, who's going to look after all the children of those lone parents when they shuffle off to work in the morning?
Josephine, Wonthaggi, Australia
Nothing is going to change - the welfare bill(£169bn) will still go up.
Mehtab, New Southgate,